The transferability of return to sport assessments and the development of rehabilitation programs based on the outcome of those tests is debatable. Candice MacMillan explores the dynamic correspondence of plyometric tests and outlines the clinical implications for rehabilitation professionals.
Introduction
In the world of Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM), numerous technological devices can provide comparative, objective measures to track athletes’ performance or injury rehabilitation progress, thereby guiding clinical decision-making. However, the accuracy of clinicians’ data interpretation and subsequent recommendations depends on their understanding of several aspects related to the devices and tests.
Practitioners use force plates to measure forces during the execution of specific athletic activities such as running or jumping(1). For example, an interlimb comparison can be useful, but there are several notable aspects to consider when utilizing force plates to assess post-injury tissue capacity.
Dynamic Correspondence
Dynamic correspondence is an exercise or training program’s ability to influence an athletes’ sporting performance directly(3). However, practitioners can extend this term to assessing athletes, i.e., how a test’s results and subsequent interventions relate to the specific physical demands of an athlete’s sport.
Practitioners assess jumping performance to guide rehabilitation progression and return to sport (RTS) decisions. It is common for athletes to present with interlimb countermovement jump (CMJ) performance differences following injury(2). However, the relationship between bilateral or unilateral CMJ performance and prospective injury or re-injury is scarce. While methodological and statistical research barriers contribute to this scarcity, practitioners should consider the tests’ dynamic correspondence. Therefore, when using test data to make inferences about athletes’ rehabilitation progress, practitioners must consider the transferability of the intervention to sports-specific performance.
Do force plates only measure force?
Like bathroom scales, force plates contain load cells that can only measure force at high sampling rates. Therefore, force plate recordings are a data array of possibly biased, discrete force values originating from an analog-to-digital converter(4). Dedicated software then uses algorithms based on the laws of physics and numerical integration to derive other variables, including acceleration, power, velocity, rate of force development, and displacement(1,4). However, these calculations and numerical integrations assume specific test conditions. Inconsistencies in assumptions and conditions (e.g., testing protocols) can influence the magnitude of the derived variables and time curves. For example, one of the methods used to calculate jump height depends on the flight-time and then applies the kinematic equations for one-dimensional motion under constant acceleration(1). However, athletes may manipulate the fight-time by tucking the knees to the chest or dorsiflexing the ankles during flight (see figure 1). Subsequently, the displacement calculation may be inaccurate as the flight-time will be longer, even though the centre of mass displacement is similar.
Considering that power equals force multiplied by velocity, and velocity is equal to displacement over time, the power and velocity values will also be inaccurate. While practitioners use standardized testing procedures and other calculation methods to determine jump height, this rudimentary example illustrates that practitioners should not solely rely on the force plate values and time curves(4). Instead, practitioners should develop a thorough understanding of the aspects that influence the derived variables.
Many coaches instruct athletes to actively dorsiflex the ankle and drive the foot into the ground during running to increase maximal force. However, when practitioners compare the results of a depth-to-vertical jump (DVJ) where the athlete intentionally “hit” the force plate to a DVJ where the athlete did not, the results are markedly different (see figure 2).
Figure 2:Depth-to-vertical jump comparison
The vertical jump height is not derived from force plate calculations but is directly measured with a vertical jump device during the same experiment. While the maximum force and average force of the “hitting” DVJ exceeds that of the second jump, the athlete’s jump height (i.e., vertical displacement) is significantly lower. Therefore, the maximum or average force might be relevant for rugby forwards during the engage phase of a scrum. However, displacement and, in turn, power are more appropriate for long jumpers and sprinters.
Dynamic correspondence of the CMJ
Many sporting activities, including running, jumping, and throwing, involve muscle actions where a movement in the opposite direction (muscular pre-stretch before shortening) precedes the desired action(1,5). While the CMJ is an example of an activity that benefits from the stretch-shortening cycle, a DVJ exploits the stretch-reflex to a much greater extent. Therefore, the development of RTS assessment protocols should consider the demands and transferability of specific jump tests to the athlete’s sport (see figure 3).
Figure 3: Differences between the squat jump, countermovement jump, and depth-to-vertical jump(5)
Practitioners use jump performance to assess an athletes’ lower body power(6). The eccentric phase of a plyometric movement produces the most significant force(1,3). As power is a product of force and velocity, neurologically well-conditioned athletes will achieve the greatest power during the eccentric phase if velocity remains constant or increases. Plyometric tests such as a squat jump or static-to-vertical jump are acyclic (only require a burst of concentric muscle action) and do not elicit the stretch reflex. Compared to most athletic activities, the CMJ exploits the stretch-reflex to a lesser extent. These tests may therefore not accurately reflect the tissue’s capacity to tolerate larger forces associated with the eccentric phase of activities that elicit the stretch-reflex maximally. Ultimately, RTS decisions based on data from squat jumps or CMJ might vastly differ from those based on data from a DVJ.
Strength deficit
A strength deficit is defined as “the difference between maximum strength with voluntary effort (e.g., static-to-vertical jump) produced in a given action and the absolute maximal strength with involuntary effort (e.g., depth-to-vertical jump) of which the athlete is capable in that same action”(3). Therefore, the strength deficit indicates the maximal potential strength that an athlete is not utilizing during the performance of a specific motor task. Clinically, athletes achieve the involuntary recruitment of muscle fibers when the body reacts to a sudden load and elicits the stretch reflex.
Identifying a strength deficit is essential for athletes whose events (such as running or jumping) do not allow adequate time to produce maximal voluntary force than actions where maximal voluntary force is longer (e.g., Olympic weightlifting). As most dynamic sport-related activities are cyclic and require repetitive maximal force production, the static-to-vertical:CMJ:DVJ ratio might provide more insight into athletes’ readiness to RTS than a single jump. Athletes participating in sports that require plyometric activities, who do not utilize the involuntary stretch reflex optimally, are more prone to overuse-type injuries of musculotendinous structures(7). These athletes attempt to repetitively produce force by maximum voluntary contractions, thereby continuously placing strain on these structures.
Clinical implications
Force plates and other technological devices provide objective data to SEM professionals. However, practitioners should be mindful of sports demands and tests transferability before including them in RTS assessment protocols. Although it is popular for practitioners to use force plates to measure the CMJ, its transferability is debatable. Comparing the unilateral and bilateral performance of the different vertical jumps might provide more insights into athletes’ readiness to RTS. Plyometrics jumps that maximally elicit the stretch-reflex, as opposed to plyometric tests that do not, might be more relevant to most sports and, therefore, more applicable for inclusion in RTP assessment protocols.
References
Ameri J of Physics. 2001;69(11):1198-1204.
Ortho J of Sports Med. 2017;5(6):232596711771091.
Verkhoshansky Y, Siff MC. Supertraining. Verkhoshansky SSTM; 2009.
J of Applied Biomechanics. 1998;14(1):105-117.
Natalia V. Shock Method and Plyometrics. Published online 2012. Accessed July 21, 2019.
Candice is a lecturer and researcher at the University of Pretoria. Her research interests include biomechanics, female-athlete-focused performance, injury prevention, and rehabilitation. Her research has been published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at sports medicine conferences. She obtained her Ph.D. and MSc (Sports Physiotherapy) from the University of the Witwatersrand. She is also the consultant for the Sport Science Lab international franchises.
Register now to get a free Issue
Get a free issue of Sports Injury Bulletin when you register.
Practical injury prevention advice, diagnostic tips, the latest treatment approaches, rehabilitation exercises, and recovery programmes to help your clients and your practice.
Clinicians must understand the sport’s demands when developing rehabilitation programs for athletes. In this series, Helen Bayne will discuss the foundational biomechanical aspects of sports and provide guidance to ensure that rehabilitation meets those demands and reduces the chance of re-injury. In part one, Helen discusses force plates, their use, and applicability within the clinical rehabilitation context.
Assessing the countermovement jump provides clinicians insight into the tissue capacity during rehabilitation and may guide decision-making. In part one, Helen Bayne discussed force plates, their use, and applicability within the clinical rehabilitation context. In part two, Helen uncovers how to assess asymmetry and interpret the testing results to improve return to sport decision-making.
The transferability of return to sport assessments and the development of rehabilitation programs based on the outcome of those tests is debatable. Candice MacMillan explores the dynamic correspondence of plyometric tests and outlines the clinical implications for rehabilitation professionals.
Acceleration is the foundation of sports performance - the quicker, the better. However, injury severely impacts acceleration, and its restoration is essential to ensuring optimal performance. Helen Bayne discusses how practitioners can optimize rehabilitation to include acceleration as a critical component to athlete rehabilitation.
The role of deceleration on injury etiology and prevention continues to gather the attention of sports medicine practitioners. Understanding the deceleration demands of sport is essential in ensuring optimal prevention and rehabilitation of injuries. Helen Bayne uncovers the assessment of deceleration and provides practical tools for practitioners to improve the management of athletes.
Change of direction is vital for athletic performance. However, the high injury risk requires athletes to have the appropriate technical and physical capacities. Helen Bayne discusses the demands of direction changes in sports and identifies key movement patterns for practitioners to address during lower limb injury prevention and rehabilitation.
Newsletter Sign Up
Keep up to date with the science and best practice in managing sports injuries
Dr. Alexandra Fandetti-Robin, Back & Body Chiropractic
"The articles are well researched, and immediately applicable the next morning in the clinic. Great bang for your buck in terms of quality and content. I love the work the SIB team is doing and am always looking forward to the next issue."
Elspeth Cowell MSCh DpodM SRCh HCPC reg
"Keeps me ahead of the game and is so relevant. The case studies are great and it just gives me that edge when treating my own clients, giving them a better treatment."
William Hunter, Nuffield Health
"I always look forward to the next month’s articles... Thank you for all the work that goes into supplying this CPD resource - great stuff"
Subscribe Today
Weekly Magazine
Online Library
Email Newsletter
Practical injury prevention advice, diagnostic tips, the latest treatment approaches, rehabilitation exercises, and recovery programmes to help your clients and your practice.
Dr. Alexandra Fandetti-Robin, Back & Body Chiropractic
"The articles are well researched, and immediately applicable the next morning in the clinic. Great bang for your buck in terms of quality and content. I love the work the SIB team is doing and am always looking forward to the next issue."
Elspeth Cowell MSCh DpodM SRCh HCPC reg
"Keeps me ahead of the game and is so relevant. The case studies are great and it just gives me that edge when treating my own clients, giving them a better treatment."
William Hunter, Nuffield Health
"I always look forward to the next month’s articles... Thank you for all the work that goes into supplying this CPD resource - great stuff"
Subscribe Today
Weekly Magazine
Online Library
Email Newsletter
Practical injury prevention advice, diagnostic tips, the latest treatment approaches, rehabilitation exercises, and recovery programmes to help your clients and your practice.
Be at the leading edge of sports injury management
Our international team of qualified experts (see above) spend hours poring over scores of technical journals and medical papers that even the most interested professionals don't have time to read.
For 17 years, we've helped hard-working physiotherapists and sports professionals like you, overwhelmed by the vast amount of new research, bring science to their treatment. Sports Injury Bulletin is the ideal resource for practitioners too busy to cull through all the monthly journals to find meaningful and applicable studies.
Sports Injury Bulletin brings together a worldwide panel of experts – including physiotherapists, doctors, researchers and sports scientists. Together we deliver everything you need to help your clients avoid – or recover as quickly as possible from – injuries.
We strip away the scientific jargon and deliver you easy-to-follow training exercises, nutrition tips, psychological strategies and recovery programmes and exercises in plain English.
Part of Green Star Media Ltd. Company number: 3008779
We use cookies so we can provide you with the best online experience. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click on the banner to find out more.