Triumphs Over Rehabilitation Thinking Traps

The impact of thinking traps on rehabilitation

Thinking traps can significantly impede an athlete’s rehabilitation progress and overall well-being. They can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and depression, hinder motivation, disrupt goal setting, and adversely affect the athlete’s relationship with their support network⁽¹⁰⁾. For example, athletes who catastrophize may struggle to focus on the immediate steps needed for recovery. They may be preoccupied with thoughts of failure or permanent damage, making concentrating on the tasks difficult. When left unaddressed, these thoughts may prolong the recovery process. "It is imperative to let athletes know that as they progress through the injury-recovery process, it is normal to experience fluctuations in thoughts, which can also be negative in nature"⁽¹⁾.

Challenging thinking traps 

Effective support for injured athletes begins with education. Clinicians can explain the concept of thinking traps in simple terms, helping athletes understand that their negative thoughts are not accurate reflections of reality but distortions. By sharing relatable examples, clinicians can show athletes how common these thinking traps are, reducing the stigma and normalizing the experience. Encouraging athletes to reframe their negative thoughts is a powerful strategy. Clinicians can guide athletes in recognizing when they’re falling into thinking traps and help them reframe those thoughts into more balanced and realistic perspectives.

1. Catastrophizing
This type of cognitive distortion involves magnifying the negative aspects of a situation and expecting the worst possible outcome. Injured athletes might catastrophize their injuries or their pain. Therefore, believing that they will never recover fully, their career is over, or they will never be pain-free. Clinicians should encourage athletes to look at the evidence for and against their catastrophic beliefs. Help them consider alternative, more positive outcomes based on realistic possibilities. For example, an athlete may think negatively, "This injury is the end of my career. I’ll never be able to compete again." This could be reframed to, "While this injury is challenging, many athletes have recovered from similar injuries. I can focus on my rehabilitation and work with my medical team to create a plan for a gradual and safe return to sports."

2. All-or-Nothing 

Also known as black-and-white thinking, this distortion involves viewing situations as either entirely good or completely bad, with no middle ground. Injured athletes might fall into this trap by believing that if they cannot perform at their previous peak, any effort is futile, leading to reduced motivation. It is essential to help athletes see the grey areas between success and failure. One way of doing this may be to emphasize that progress is a positive step, no matter how small. For example, an athlete may present a negative thought such as "If I can’t perform at my previous level, there’s no point in trying at all." Clinicians could help an athlete reframe this by replacing this negative thought with a more neutral positive statement such as, "It’s natural to face setbacks during recovery. Even small progress is a step in the right direction. I can set achievable goals that help me regain strength and confidence, and I’ll keep building from there."

3. Overgeneralization
Overgeneralization involves drawing broad conclusions based on limited evidence or a single negative experience. Injured athletes may generalize a setback in their recovery to predict future failures, leading to demotivation. Clinicians can encourage athletes to examine whether their current experience applies to all situations. This would help them understand that setbacks are part of the process, not indicative of future failure. For example, an athlete’s negative thought may be, "I failed to reach my recovery goal today, so I’m destined to fail in everything." Helping athletes consider a more balanced perspective may encourage reframing this thinking trap. For example, clinicians could reframe it as "Recovery has its ups and downs, and not every day will be perfect. One setback doesn’t define your entire journey."

4. Personalization
This thinking trap occurs when individuals take responsibility for events beyond their control or attribute them to their actions. Injured athletes may personalize their injuries, feeling guilt or shame as if they caused the injury, affecting their self-esteem and recovery mindset. Clinicians should guide athletes to recognize that injuries are often beyond their control. This could shift their focus from blame to proactive recovery. For example, if an athlete presents a negative thought such as, "It’s my fault I got injured. I should have been more careful." The clinician may identify that this personalization is not helpful and, instead, help the athlete reframe this, such as, "Injuries are a part of sports, and they can happen to even the most careful athletes. Blaming yourself won’t help your recovery. Instead, focus on what you can control—following the rehabilitation plan and making safe choices."

5. Emotional Reasoning
Emotional reasoning involves if one’s emotional state reflects objective reality. If an injured athlete feels sad, they may believe their situation is hopeless despite contrary evidence. Clinicians should help athletes understand that feelings aren’t always accurate indicators of reality. Encourage them to seek evidence for their beliefs rather than solely relying on emotions.

Conclusion

Encouraging athletes to use these reframing techniques helps them develop a more balanced thinking pattern during recovery. In doing so, they may be better able to engage in rehabilitation activities and move towards effective action. Clinicians can play a role in helping th raise awareness of and challenge negative thinking patterns, to maintain motivation and approach setbacks with a constructive and adaptable attitude. Through psychoeducation and cognitive reframing, negative thinking patterns can be challenged to foster a more positive recovery experience. This comprehensive approach enhances the rehabilitation process and contributes to the athlete’s overall well-being and future success in sports.

References

1. J of athletic training. 2015 50(1), 95-104.
2. J Sports Med. 2016, 50, 145–148. 
3. Brit J of Sports Med. 2000, 34(6), 436-439.
4. Cog Therapy of Depression. 1979, New York.
5. The Sport Psych. 1990, 4(3), 261-274.
6. Online J Sport Psych. 2002, 4.
7. J of Clin Sport Psych. 2008, 2(1), 71-90.
8. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2013, 8(4), pp. 1029-1044.
9. J of Sport Rehab. 2005, 14(1), 20-34.
10. Clin Psychology Review. 2020, 76, 101813.