You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
Open kinetic chain knee extension continues to grab the attention of clinicians globally. Eurico Marques unpacks the clinical implications of introducing knee extensions in ACL rehabilitation and provides clinicians with evidence-based guidelines.
LA Galaxy forward Joseph Paintsil receives treatment after a challenge in the second half against Inter Miami CF at Dignity Health Sports Park. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have a devasting impact on an athlete’s quality of life and physical activity levels. In the short term, quadriceps weakness and pain are ubiquitous(1). Moreover, less than half of athletes meet quadriceps strength symmetry goals when cleared to return to sports (RTS)(2,3). Furthermore, muscle quality and morphology differences following injury persist despite ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and extensive rehabilitation(4). Restoring quadricep muscle strength is integral to recovery following ACLR, and open kinetic chain exercises (OKC) should play a role(5).
The re-injury risk following ACLR is four times higher for up to two years for athletes wanting to return to high-level sports(6). However, if clinicians delay their return until they have better quadricep strength and symmetry, their re-injury risk decreases significantly(6). Therefore, clinicians must educate athletes on the importance of an extensive rehabilitation program that includes time-based and functional criteria to reduce re-injury and post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis risk and improve long-term function(6,7). Furthermore, this reduces the burden of long-term healthcare costs.
When designing ACLR rehabilitation programs, clinicians must consider tissue healing time frames, particularly with the graft and the harvesting site. The first six to twelve weeks are critical as the graft is most vulnerable to loosening or overstretching during this period(8). Furthermore, graft type (i.e., patellar tendon and hamstring tendon) affects the laxity risk(8). For example, patellar grafts appeared less vulnerable to the early introduction of OKC knee extension at two, four, six, or twelve weeks post-op despite different protocols, exercise dosages, and progression rates(8).
On the contrary, hamstring grafts have inconsistent results(8). Initiating OKC exercises at week four but limiting ROM between 45-90° of knee flexion until the 12 weeks shows no difference in laxity at follow-up(9). Meanwhile, initiating OKC exercises at four weeks and progressing to full knee exercises at six weeks demonstrates increased laxity(8). However, the results were below the clinically meaningful threshold(8). Despite the apparent clinical insignificance of the increased laxity, it still presents clinicians with a puzzle, as many view any laxity as too much. One challenging aspect of the current evidence pool is the lack of data on the re-rupture rates and adverse outcomes.
The femoral and tibial fixation tunnels are the weak links immediately following surgery. A patellar tendon autograft takes six to eight weeks to incorporate into the tunnels, while soft tissue autografts can take eight to 12 weeks. During the first two to four weeks post-surgery, the graft weakens, then revascularizes and matures progressively over several weeks, increasing its tensile strength. Incorporation and maturation take longer in allografts than in autografts. Therefore, clinicians may need to be more cautious with athletes who undergo allograft reconstruction regarding their rehabilitation and RTS. Clinicians must consider tissue healing, graft incorporation and maturation, and the differences in the graft source when designing rehabilitation programs(10).
Anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation includes three criterion-based postoperative phases. Namely, impairment-based, sport-specific training, and return to sports. During rehabilitation, exercise selection remains contentious, particularly open kinetic chain vs. closed kinetic chain (CKC) knee extension(11).
Open kinetic chain describes an exercise in which the foot is not in contact with a solid surface, whereas CKC describes an exercise in which the foot is in contact with a solid surface.
Open kinetic chain exercises continue to gain traction in ACL rehabilitation. However, beliefs still exist that they are dangerous and increase graft laxity. Understandably, clinicians would not want to increase the ACL graft laxity risk. However, inadequate quadriceps strength increases the risk of re-injury. Perhaps clinicians are avoiding an essential long-term rehabilitation tool that impacts athlete well-being.
While avoiding OKC exercises, CKC exercises have gained popularity as they support the functional exercise narrative. Furthermore, there is an increased perception that these exercises are safer than OKC as many clinicians believe that CKC exercises strain the ACL graft less due to increased tibiofemoral joint compressive forces, hamstrings co-contraction, and reduced anterior tibial displacement(12). However, this is not the case. Climbing stairs and lunges place two to three more strain on the ACL than isometric OKC at higher ranges(12).
Comparing the peak ACL strains during OKC and CKC reveals similar results (see table 1). However, increasing resistance during the OKC exercise produces increases in strain that do not occur during CKC exercises(12). Interestingly, OKC knee extension against the 24Nm resistance produces a similar strain to a Lachman test, which clinicians frequently perform postoperatively to assess graft stability(12).
Exercise | Peak Strain % | |
OKC | Isometric quadricep contraction at 15° (30Nm of extension torque) |
4.4 |
CKC | Squatting with sports cord | 4.0 |
OKC | Active flexion-extension of the knee with 45N weight boot | 3.8 |
Lachman Test (150N of anterior shear load; 30° flexion) | 3.7 | |
CKC | Squatting | 3.6 |
OKC | Active flexion-extension of the knee (no weight) | 2.8 |
OKC | Simultaneous quadricep and hamstring contraction at 15° | 2.8 |
OKC | Isometric quadricep contraction at 30° (30Nm extension torque) | 2.7 |
CKC | Stair climbing | 2.7 |
CKC | Leg press at 20° flexion (40% body weight) | 2.1 |
CKC | Lunge | 1.9 |
CKC | Stationary bicycle | 1.7 |
OKC | Isometric hamstring contraction at 15° (to -10Nm flexion torque) | 0.6 |
OKC | Simultaneous quadricep and hamstring contraction at 30° | 0.4 |
OKC | Isometric quadricep contraction at 60° (30Nm extension torque) | 0 |
OKC | Isometric quadricep contraction at 90° (30Nm extension torque) | 0 |
OKC | Simultaneous quadricep and hamstring contraction at 60 and 90° | 0 |
OKC | Isometric hamstring contraction at 30, 60, and 90° (to -10Nm flexion torque) | 0 |
Researchers in the Netherlands conducted a systematic review where they created a consensus statement that suggests that CKC and OKC training can be used to regain quadriceps strength. The consensus states that OKC exercises should only be performed by week four postoperative in a restricted range of movement (ROM) of 90– 45°(13). This is aligned with a systematic review by researchers at the University of Richmond in Australia. It suggests it is sensible to introduce OKC exercises that minimize ACL graft loading after four weeks (i.e., limiting range)(8).
Clinicians at the Delaware Physical Therapy Clinic at the University of Delaware introduce long arc quad (LAQ) 90-0° within the first postoperative week (see table 2)(14). It is important to note that they have rehabilitation modifications for different graft types that clinicians must consider when doing ACL rehabilitation. For example, allografts are slower to incorporate, therefore rehabilitation progression is slower, hamstring tendon autografts have knee flexion restrictions that respect tissue healing, patellar tendon autografts might need knee extension ROM modifications to avoid possible irritation, and much more (view full rehabilitation program for more details). Their approach advocates for clinicians to utilize OKC exercise in ACLR rehabilitation programs. To support clinical decision-making, clinicians must measure quadriceps strength and educate athletes on the importance of quadriceps strength for long-term knee health and performance(5).
Postoperative timeline | OKC prescription | Notes | Clinical Takeaways |
Week 1 | LAQ 90-0° with no/light resistance. | Resisted isometric muscle testing is only performed when athletes can assume a 45 – 90° knee flexion position without pain. | The testing protocol aligns with the biomechanical data, demonstrating no strain on the ACL at 60° and 90°. |
Week 2-3 | LAQ: Heavy cuff weights/knee extension machine. | Assess response to exercises frequently, stay at the same intensity, or decrease if effusion increases. | High priority on effusion and pain monitoring. Effusion < 2+ (sweep test) and pain <5/10, particularly at the graft site. |
Week 4-6 | LAQ: Knee extension machine. | Quadricep muscle testing: • Isokinetic dynamometer in isometric or isokinetic (60/90/120°/ sec) odes, or • Handheld dynamometry with fixation, or • 1RM on a knee extension machine 90-45° or - 90-0° (week 7+). |
Various options exist, but testing is critical to ensure correct intensity prescription. |
Week 7-8 | Single-leg OKC exercises at 60-75% 1RM. | Regular physiotherapist appointments (2x per week). | Clinicians adjust the program accordingly, and they have greater control due to visit frequency. |
Week 10-12 | Knee extension machine: single leg/eccentrics @ 60-85% 1 RM. | Progressive overload is critical in developing strength. Clinicians must test strength before prescribing exercise to ensure adequate intensity. |
|
Week 13-16+ | Knee extension machine: single leg/eccentrics @ 75-90% 1 RM |
For full protocol, visit sites.udel.edu/ptclinic/professionals/guidelines/
Recently (2024), researchers at the Orthosport Rehab Centre in France aimed to assess the association of OKC exercise for quadriceps and hamstring muscle strengthening using knee extensions. They included 103 recreational athletes who had undergone hamstring tendon autograft ACLR. The control group completed rehabilitation three times per week, including only CKC exercise. The intervention group completed a mixed protocol of OKC and CKC exercises(15).
The OKC exercise protocol focused on the quadriceps and hamstring muscles and was introduced two weeks after surgery without resistance. If the participants had a stroke test value <1+, 0-110◦ knee ROM, no quads lag, and between-leg laxity < 1.5 mm on a 134N laximetry test, the clinicians progressed the exercises at four weeks with progressive external resistance. The intervention program included:
• Open kinetic chain exercises (isolated leg extension and seated leg curl) on an isokinetic dynamometer.
• Isokinetic strengthening: 10 x 8 reps at a speed of 60°.s− 1, three times per week.
• The resistance was set at 60% of their maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), evaluated by hand-held dynamometry once a week at 90°.
The study results showed that early (two+ weeks) OKC with CKC at high volumes and moderate intensity can be used in full ROM (0-100) and seems to be safe as laxity was substantially the same at three and six months(15). Furthermore, at both follow-ups, the intervention group had significantly higher quadriceps, hamstring strength, and limb symmetry index than the control. This study highlights the benefits of OKC exercise, particularly on the hamstring strength symmetry index.
The evidence and practical recommendations for OKC exercise prescription are not standardized across research study design or real-world practice. Therefore, clinicians need to use their clinical reasoning to make decisions. Depending on the clinician’s degree of experience and confidence, the general recommendations are:
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation is a multi-faceted process. Contention around exercise choice should not overshadow the purpose of rehabilitation: a safe and timely RTS. Irrespective of exercise choice, clinicians must ensure that athletes reach the recommended strength goals. Open kinetic chain exercises are vital to ACLR rehabilitation, regardless of when they are initiated. They isolate muscles and help to overcome any compensations that may impact recovery. Early introduction warrants vigilance on joint health and healing; late introduction warrants the purposeful effort to ensure quadriceps strengthening. Great clinical reasoning allows clinicians to make decisions that positively impact athlete well-being. Open kinetic chain exercises are vital to that decision-making process and shouldn’t be neglected. Combining exercise types may be necessary to rehabilitate athletes back to their previous level of function.
1. Sports Health, 7(3), pp. 231–238
2. J of Orthop and Sports Phys Ther, 47(11), 825-833
3. Sports Health. 2015 May;7(3):231-8
4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 21;98(18):1541-7
5. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Sep;50(9):473-475
6. Br J Sports Med. 2016 July; 50(13): 804–808
7. Sports Med 47, 1271–1288 (2017) – I want to read this article
8. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jul;48(7):552-566
9. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:788-794
10. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(3):208-220
11. The American J of sports med, 23(4), 401-406
12. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Jul;33(3):134-40
13. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1506–1515
14. ‘Rehab Guidelines & Protocols’ (2016) Physical Therapy Clinic, 29 January. Available at: sites.udel.edu/ptclinic/professionals/guidelines/ (Accessed: 23 February 2024)
15. Phys Ther in Sport 66 (2024) 61–66
Our international team of qualified experts (see above) spend hours poring over scores of technical journals and medical papers that even the most interested professionals don't have time to read.
For 17 years, we've helped hard-working physiotherapists and sports professionals like you, overwhelmed by the vast amount of new research, bring science to their treatment. Sports Injury Bulletin is the ideal resource for practitioners too busy to cull through all the monthly journals to find meaningful and applicable studies.
*includes 3 coaching manuals
Get Inspired
All the latest techniques and approaches
Sports Injury Bulletin brings together a worldwide panel of experts – including physiotherapists, doctors, researchers and sports scientists. Together we deliver everything you need to help your clients avoid – or recover as quickly as possible from – injuries.
We strip away the scientific jargon and deliver you easy-to-follow training exercises, nutrition tips, psychological strategies and recovery programmes and exercises in plain English.