You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
Lower-limb tendinopathy diagnosis is tricky but important, as an incorrect diagnosis may lead athletes down the wrong rehabilitation path. Ebonie Rio and Myles Murphy unpack an evidence-informed approach to diagnosing lower-limb tendinopathy.
Syracuse Orange wide receiver Umari Hatcher catches a pass over South Florida Bulls defensive back Aamaris Brown in the fourth quarter during the RoofClaim.com Boca Raton Bowl at FAU Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports
The most common tendinopathy sites in the lower limb are the Achilles tendon, patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and gluteal tendon. Specifically, when referring to tendinopathy, practitioners refer to localized tendon pain that results in functional impairments(1). This can occur in both physically active and more sedentary populations. Individuals experience tendon pain when the load exceeds capacity – which can occur at nearly any activity level(2).
Clinicians typically think of tendinopathy as a problem for athletes. However, they are beginning to recognize the growing burden of tendon pain in non-athletic populations. Using the Achilles tendon as a single example, in running athletes, tendinopathy of the Achilles is one of the most prevalent general running-related injuries (~10% of all injuries)(3). Conversely, in the general population, Achilles tendinopathy has an incidence of 2.16 occurrences per 1000 person-years(4). Therefore, clinicians must be ready to diagnose tendinopathy in athletic and non-athletic populations.
The tendinopathy model continuum is the most contemporary model of the underlying tendinopathy pathophysiology(5,6). The main takeaway from the continuum model is that tendinopathy occurs in a chronically underloaded or acutely overloaded tendon. The specific types of load that contribute to the onset of tendinopathy are the tensile and compressive forces (and often in combination), as opposed to shear loads that are typically associated with other pathologies such as peritonitis (see figure 1). In particular, the combination of high tensile and compressive loads appears to be the primary driver of structural tendon changes(7). Furthermore, the interfascicular matrix plays a role in the pathology(8). So, while the continuum model helps understand pathology (a known risk factor for tendinopathy), it is important to remember that asymptomatic pathology is common, and imaging is not required for the diagnosis(1,9).
General principles
Six critical principles determine when the source of symptoms is the tendon. They include:
1. Provocative activities align with known activities to aggravate the tendon,
2. There is a clear warm-up phenomenon with exercise,
3. Symptoms (e.g., stiffness) are worse the day following provocative exercise,
4. Increased tendon load of exercises is more provocative for symptoms,
5. Single-leg loading is more provocative than double-leg loading, and
6. Pain remains localized when provoked and does not move or spread.
The subjective assessment for people with suspected tendinopathy revolves around ruling out inflammatory pathologies masquerading as tendinopathy (e.g., psoriatic arthritis) and ensuring the patient’s symptoms align with the known behaviors of tendinopathy. Clinicians must ensure that: 1) provocative activities align with known activities to aggravate the tendon, 2) there is a clear warm-up phenomenon with exercise, and 3) symptoms (e.g., stiffness) are worse the day following provocative exercise.
1. Provocative activities align with known activities to aggravate the tendon
It is imperative that in the subjective assessment, clinicians must determine the activities that are most likely to aggravate a patient’s tendon (see table 1). In just a few words, the patients can essentially allow the clinician to rule out a diagnosis of tendinopathy. This is possible as only tensile and compressive loading contributes to tendinopathy. Thus, if patients’ primary complaints are provocative loads, most commonly due to shear forces, the clinician can be confident they are unlikely to have tendinopathy. For example, suppose an athlete presented with pain in the Achilles tendon region that was predominantly aggravated by cycling or rowing (shear forces). In that case, the clinician can confidently rule out an Achilles tendinopathy diagnosis. Similarly, suppose a marathon runner presents with anterior knee pain most aggravating during their long, steady-state runs. In that case, the clinician can be confident they are unlikely to have tendinopathy, given that running is not a high-tendon load for the patellar tendon.
Achilles | Tensile | Compressive | Tensile and Compressive | Shear |
Achilles | Running, jumping | Ankle dorsiflexion (for the insertion) | Running in a more dorsiflexed position (e.g., modifying the running technique to barefoot running) |
Cycling, rowing |
Patellar | Jumping, change of direction | Kneeling | ||
Hamstring | Running | Hip flexion, sitting | Running in deep hip flexion (e.g., up-hill running) | |
Gluteal | Walking, hopping, jogging | Crossing legs, lying on the side | Walking with significant Trendelenburg signs, running |
2. There is a clear warm-up phenomenon with exercise
One of the hallmark signs of tendinopathy is a warm-up effect with loading. This means that when someone starts exercising, they may have some tendon pain. However, this should be reduced as they continue to perform their exercise. If someone is not experiencing a warm-up phenomenon, and their pain gradually worsens when performing exercise, it is highly unlikely that their primary source of symptoms is the tendon.
3. Symptoms (e.g., stiffness) are worse the day following provocative exercise
The final indicator from a patient’s history that will indicate to the clinician that their tendon is the source of their symptoms is that they will feel worse the day following provocative exercise. Tendinopathy patients often report feeling good the day they perform aggravating exercise as they have warmed up. The next day, particularly when they wake up, they notice their tendon is very stiff. If the patient does not experience a clear increase in the stiffness or tightness of their tendon the day following provocative loading, it is again unlikely that they have tendinopathy.
The objective assessment for people with tendinopathy revolves around three pain assessments: 1) increased tendon load of exercises is more provocative for symptoms, 2) single-leg loading is more provocative than double-leg loading, and 3) the pain remains localized when provoked and does not move or spread (see figure 2).
1. Increased tendon load of exercises is more provocative for symptoms
The first method to assess whether a patient’s pain is ‘load dependent’ is to have them perform progressively more challenging exercises and assess whether pain worsens as load increases. For example, in the Achilles tendon, a clinician can ask a patient for the severity of their pain with a double-leg calf raise, pain severity with a single-leg calf raise, and then double-leg jumping followed by single-leg hopping (stretch-shorten cycle). In Achilles tendinopathy, jumping and hopping would be expected to be painful.
2. Single-leg loading is more provocative than double-leg loading
The second essential assessment is ensuring that single-leg loading is more provocative than double-leg loading, as single-leg loading increases the load upon the tendon. Using the examples provided above, single-leg calf raises or hopping in the Achilles should be more painful than the double-leg. Meanwhile, in the patellar, single-leg squats and single-leg jumping should be more painful than the pain recorded with double-leg tasks.
3. Pain remains localized when provoked and does not move or spread
Once a clinician determines the pain severity, they must also determine the pain location to ensure the pain does not move or spread. Tendon pain is localized. It will not be the source of pain for symptoms that move around or spread. Furthermore, clinicians must determine the pain location during the objective loading task assessment, as a patient’s ability to recall the pain site is unreliable. Researchers at La Trobe University in Australia demonstrated that ~55% of people with Achilles pain report different pain regions on recall compared to when the tendon is actively loaded(10).
Clinicians use imaging and palpation in research and clinical practice to assist with the tendinopathy diagnosis(11,12). However, their specificity is questionable when assessing tendinopathy.
Imaging
Imaging is an invaluable component of our current healthcare system. However, clinicians must recognize the benefits and limitations of musculoskeletal imaging, as asymptomatic pathology on imaging is very common for musculoskeletal diseases (particularly tendons)(9,13). As tendinopathy is a clinical diagnosis, clinicians do not need imaging to confirm the diagnosis. This also makes sense when the specificity of imaging in tendinopathy is relatively poor (e.g., poor capacity to rule in a diagnosis due to how common asymptomatic pathology can be). However, the sensitivity of imaging in tendinopathy is excellent (e.g., excellent capacity to rule out a diagnosis of tendinopathy if imaging is normal). Therefore, clinicians must view imaging in light of its strengths and limitations so that instead of using it to ‘confirm’ a clinical diagnosis, only use it to rule out a tendinopathy diagnosis when the imaging is normal.
Palpation
Palpation suffers from the same limitations as musculoskeletal imaging (poor specificity, excellent sensitivity). Unfortunately, tendons often become sensitized in the presence of nearby chronic pain conditions (e.g., the patellar tendon becomes sensitized in knee osteoarthritis), and if relying on palpation tenderness to make a diagnosis, you can often go wrong. For example, less than one-third of people with palpation pain on the inferior patellar pole actually have patellar tendinopathy(14). Instead, due to its excellent sensitivity, clinicians must only use palpation to rule out a diagnosis of tendinopathy(15). For example, tendinopathy is unlikely if the tendon is not painful on palpation.
Diagnosing lower-limb tendinopathy can seem complicated, but if clinicians stick to the six essential criteria to confirm the tendinopathy diagnosis (see figure 3), it will be much simpler!
Our international team of qualified experts (see above) spend hours poring over scores of technical journals and medical papers that even the most interested professionals don't have time to read.
For 17 years, we've helped hard-working physiotherapists and sports professionals like you, overwhelmed by the vast amount of new research, bring science to their treatment. Sports Injury Bulletin is the ideal resource for practitioners too busy to cull through all the monthly journals to find meaningful and applicable studies.
*includes 3 coaching manuals
Get Inspired
All the latest techniques and approaches
Sports Injury Bulletin brings together a worldwide panel of experts – including physiotherapists, doctors, researchers and sports scientists. Together we deliver everything you need to help your clients avoid – or recover as quickly as possible from – injuries.
We strip away the scientific jargon and deliver you easy-to-follow training exercises, nutrition tips, psychological strategies and recovery programmes and exercises in plain English.